Recent comments

  • Reply to: Betsy DeVos Ethics Report Reveals Ties to Student Debt Collection Firm   1 week 1 day ago
    Who is responsible for prosecuting her for this and which attorney cannot argue that she clearly is violating this conflict and will resume profiting from this the instant she leaves office? Are the wealthy so amoral they can lie and not blink the way she does?
  • Reply to: How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf   1 week 3 days ago

    Of COURSE the Monsters who Murdered the babies would pack the incubators off carefully and return them INSTEAD OF BLOWING THEM TO KINGDOM COME, you brainiac you.

  • Reply to: Dark Justice   2 weeks 2 days ago
    This reminds me of the old "Trips for Judges" program and other events run by F.R.E.E. Ginny Thomas attended these too, along with Scalia and many of the Federalist Society players. The names of the fronts may change, but the players, the money, and the intent remain constant. That's the rightwing playbook.
  • Reply to: About ALEC Exposed   2 weeks 6 days ago
    Lisa. Someone sent me a document from CMD and I am not sure of the implications. Can you explain? Thanks http://www.alecexposed.org/w/images/7/72/2D3-Family_Education_Savings_Account_Act_Exposed.pdf
  • Reply to: Kochs Bankroll Move to Rewrite the Constitution   3 weeks 1 hour ago
    Sharon-There are no guarantees. COS and those pushing an Article V are either deceived or are willing to deceive. This is ALL we have regarding an Article V-"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate."

Pages