Did you even read the article, Win? It distinctly said they *both* acted to bypass Congress for their failure to include illegals they thought should have been included in direct contravention of the newly passed legislation--not in support of it. If anything were to be considered unconstitutional, that would be. Obama's act would have a similar effect to the bill that *would* most likely pass if Boehner would just bring it to the floor. SMH.
The statement said the Senate passed it and Boehner wouldn't bring it up for a vote. "Similarly, in 2013 the Senate passed an immigration reform bill, and House Speaker John Boehner declined to bring it to the floor (although the bill would likely pass if the House did vote). Obama's executive action implements the provisions of the Senate bill, although around twice as many people would be affected if the bill became law."
You're absolutely sure it's unconstitutional? Like, as sure as you would be if you were a constitutional lawyer? Don't you think the President of the United States, who is a Constitutional lawyer, and has a staff of advisors working with him would know if he was acting in contrast to the constitution?
Did you read the article or just skip down to the comments? If you had read the post you would know you are parroting all the other voices who continue to bellow their ignorance of the subject.
Pages