Seriously, you only need to look at the picture to see why they're picking on him. It wouldn't surprise me if they put a turban on him for his trial.
I believe the issues raised here are so fundamental and far-reaching as to merit a constitutional amendment. Here is my proposal:
<i>1. No person except a natural born Citizen, having Green-Glowing Jellyfish DNA, shall be eligible to the Office of President.
<i>2. The words "natural born" shall not be construed as to include persons conceived by means of Artificial Insemination even if born within the United States by Vaginal Delivery.</i>
<i>3. The Congress shall have the power to ensure an adequate Population of eligible Candidates for the Presidency with appropriate Legislation, including the awarding of Contracts.</i>
It would be nice to think the CIA was voluntarily complying with the l994 ARRB JFK Act declassification order, recently countermanded by Bush and Gang, or just an honest 30 year house keeping. That doesn't seem to fit their MO however. I'd expect some sort of counter spin or limited hang out relating to some recent agenda, perhaps a new 1000 page JFK hit cover-up book recently released and soon to be serialized on TV, a follow up to Hartmann and Waldrons Mafia limited hang out book? (i.e. Blame the victims, RFK, never mind the CIA Atty.Gen. Report indicating they were informed after the fact!) What would they have to cover up? McCords CIA take down of Nixon with the Watergate set up after Nixon thrreatened to reveal "the Bay of Pigs Thing"?
This is just the tip of the iceberg. What about the 1980's when the CIA became drug dealers? My husband and I got caught in the mess in the late 1980's and early 1990's in Tucson, one of the two biggest drug warehouses in the United States (along with El Paso). If you want confirmation, ask Barbara Savage and Alejandro Valdez, CIA agents, and ask the Tucson Police Department who sent members of Internal Affairs and MANTIS to lean on us. They threatened to put us in jail if we got involved. Every time I thought I was wrong, was being paranoid, I came back to one simple question: What were two CIA agents doing in Tucson, one of whom sat in my family room discussing Karl Marx and the true opiate of the people.
LAKE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CLUB
HEALTH CARE FINANCE SYSTEM REPORT
June 9, 2007
Our fragmented health care financing system consists of for profit insurance corporations, not for profit health care insurance and delivery corporations, government administered health insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration and military health care systems), and various charitable organizations. (The Federal Employee Health Plan which is offered to members of Congress and all other Federal employees is similar to major corporation health plans in that it offers a variety of private insurance plans to the employees and members of Congress).
There are three basic problems with the current health care finance system:
1. Coverage: 47 million Americans and at least 5 million Californians do not have health insurance. This is caused primarily by the high cost of health insurance. All or most other industrial nations cover nearly 100% of their citizens.
2. Outcomes: In spite of having the most advanced health care technologies, the U.S. ranks at or near the bottom of industrialized nations in overall health care outcomes. The poor health care outcome is caused primarily by the large number of uninsured Americans. It is also caused by restrictions in coverage by insurance corporations to hold down costs and by the high cost of the health care finance system.
3. Cost: There are several factors that drive up the cost of insurance;
A. Administrative costs; For profit corporations are the largest providers (in numbers of insured) of health care insurance. Their administrative costs range from 18 to 23% or more of revenues. In comparison, Medicare administrative costs are 2 to 3% of revenues. The multiplicity of health care plans require that health care providers employ additional administrative staff to comply with the different requirements and forms of the different plans.
B. Profits; Stock market pressures for short term exceptional profits drive up the cost of health care insurance corporations, delivery corporations, and manufactures of equipment, products and technologies. Many private non-corporate providers and suppliers also seek higher profits by increasing their prices. The quality of care and the universality of care are diminished and the cost of care is increased by the pressure for higher profits.
C. Employer costs; Most employer based health insurance is purchased from for profit insurance corporations. The high and rising cost to employers of this insurance reduces the employer's price competition with foreign firms and domestic firms that do not provide health insurance.. Employers reduce or curtail their contributions to employee health care plans to reduce costs. Employees then seek other plans or become uninsured both of which increase the cost of health care insurance.
D. Risk pool; The overall costs of health care for all participants in an insurance plan (the risk pool) are divided among the participants by actuary tables. The more participants there are in the plan, the lower the cost to each participant. The smaller the risk pool, the higher the cost to each participant. For profit , not for profit, and government administered health insurance plans divide the population into hundreds of risk pools at a higher cost to each participant than would be the case with fewer risk pools. In addition, for profit health care insurance corporations seek to include only healthy participants to contain costs and increase profits which raises the cost of insurance to less healthy participants and/or increases the number of uninsured who then rely on more expensive emergency room care.
E. Overlapping coverage; Because few if any of the private for profit health care plans offer complete coverage, many participants enroll in more that one plan to get all the coverage they need. This includes high deductible plans for catastrophic events, high premium plans for preventative care, dental plans, vision plans, long term care plans, plans at work, sick pay plans, plans at school, plans included in automobile insurance (including uninsured motorist coverage), plans included in homeowners insurance, separate plans for each spouse, Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans health care and military health care. Any family or even any person can easily find themselves in need of more than one plan to get all the coverage they need even though those plans may well overlap in other coverage areas.
F. Legislation; Our fragmented health care finance system was created and is regulated by legislation. That legislation is full of inconsistencies and loopholes that allow fraud and abuse which increases costs. In addition, legislation allowing general and specific tax breaks and regulatory relief have increased corporate profits with no visible significant cost reductions for participants as exemplified by the Medicare Part D prescription insurance legislation which was written by the pharmaceutical lobby and has enriched the pharmaceutical and health care finance corporations. Additional legislation and regulation further complicates the fragmented system driving up the cost of administration.
G. Economies of Scale: The multiplicity of health care insurance plans reduce the purchasing power of those corporations providing the plans for prescription drugs, equipment, devices, supplies and services that they pay for compared to fewer plans with more participants each.
H. Economic Loss: The lack of universal health coverage and optimal health outcomes results in unnecessary lost work hours, reduced productivity and higher production costs than would be the case with a healthier work force.
Our fragmented health care financing system was created piece by piece in response to particular problems and incentives. The assembled pieces are not well integrated with each other or with the overall system. There are at least several cost spirals within the system that drive up costs and drive down coverage and outcomes. Just two examples are:
1. The rising cost of employer based for profit health insurance causes more and more companies to reduce or eliminate their participation in employee health care insurance. This reduces the size of the risk pools and increases the cost of health care to the remaining employers in the risk pools which causes more employers to reduce or eliminate participation.
2. The rising cost of health insurance forces many people to go without insurance which increases the number of uninsured who then rely on more expensive emergency room service for all their medical care. That cost for emergency room care is then passed on to the remaining participants in the risk pools which forces still more people to go without insurance. The increase in the number of uninsured also reduces the size of the risk pool which increases the cost to the remaining participants in the pool which forces even more people to become uninsured.
These and other cost spirals plus the other problems listed above are driving costs up and driving coverage and outcomes down. The basic problem lies in our very complicated and fragmented health care financing system. No corporation could function profitably if it was so disorganized and inefficient. Any further measures to repair specific problems in this system other than a unifying reorganization will only complicate, and possibly fragment it, further.
How utterly pitiful...and we tend to think we are so smart.
The ignorance, 41%, is appalling.
It would be nice to think the CIA was voluntarily complying with the l994 ARRB JFK Act declassification order, recently countermanded by Bush and Gang, or just an honest 30 year house keeping. That doesn't seem to fit their MO however. I'd expect some sort of counter spin or limited hang out relating to some recent agenda, perhaps a new 1000 page JFK hit cover-up book recently released and soon to be serialized on TV, a follow up to Hartmann and Waldrons Mafia limited hang out book? (i.e. Blame the victims, RFK, never mind the CIA Atty.Gen. Report indicating they were informed after the fact!) What would they have to cover up? McCords CIA take down of Nixon with the Watergate set up after Nixon thrreatened to reveal "the Bay of Pigs Thing"?
This is just the tip of the iceberg. What about the 1980's when the CIA became drug dealers? My husband and I got caught in the mess in the late 1980's and early 1990's in Tucson, one of the two biggest drug warehouses in the United States (along with El Paso). If you want confirmation, ask Barbara Savage and Alejandro Valdez, CIA agents, and ask the Tucson Police Department who sent members of Internal Affairs and MANTIS to lean on us. They threatened to put us in jail if we got involved. Every time I thought I was wrong, was being paranoid, I came back to one simple question: What were two CIA agents doing in Tucson, one of whom sat in my family room discussing Karl Marx and the true opiate of the people.
LAKE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CLUB
HEALTH CARE FINANCE SYSTEM REPORT
June 9, 2007
Our fragmented health care financing system consists of for profit insurance corporations, not for profit health care insurance and delivery corporations, government administered health insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration and military health care systems), and various charitable organizations. (The Federal Employee Health Plan which is offered to members of Congress and all other Federal employees is similar to major corporation health plans in that it offers a variety of private insurance plans to the employees and members of Congress).
There are three basic problems with the current health care finance system:
1. Coverage: 47 million Americans and at least 5 million Californians do not have health insurance. This is caused primarily by the high cost of health insurance. All or most other industrial nations cover nearly 100% of their citizens.
2. Outcomes: In spite of having the most advanced health care technologies, the U.S. ranks at or near the bottom of industrialized nations in overall health care outcomes. The poor health care outcome is caused primarily by the large number of uninsured Americans. It is also caused by restrictions in coverage by insurance corporations to hold down costs and by the high cost of the health care finance system.
3. Cost: There are several factors that drive up the cost of insurance;
A. Administrative costs; For profit corporations are the largest providers (in numbers of insured) of health care insurance. Their administrative costs range from 18 to 23% or more of revenues. In comparison, Medicare administrative costs are 2 to 3% of revenues. The multiplicity of health care plans require that health care providers employ additional administrative staff to comply with the different requirements and forms of the different plans.
B. Profits; Stock market pressures for short term exceptional profits drive up the cost of health care insurance corporations, delivery corporations, and manufactures of equipment, products and technologies. Many private non-corporate providers and suppliers also seek higher profits by increasing their prices. The quality of care and the universality of care are diminished and the cost of care is increased by the pressure for higher profits.
C. Employer costs; Most employer based health insurance is purchased from for profit insurance corporations. The high and rising cost to employers of this insurance reduces the employer's price competition with foreign firms and domestic firms that do not provide health insurance.. Employers reduce or curtail their contributions to employee health care plans to reduce costs. Employees then seek other plans or become uninsured both of which increase the cost of health care insurance.
D. Risk pool; The overall costs of health care for all participants in an insurance plan (the risk pool) are divided among the participants by actuary tables. The more participants there are in the plan, the lower the cost to each participant. The smaller the risk pool, the higher the cost to each participant. For profit , not for profit, and government administered health insurance plans divide the population into hundreds of risk pools at a higher cost to each participant than would be the case with fewer risk pools. In addition, for profit health care insurance corporations seek to include only healthy participants to contain costs and increase profits which raises the cost of insurance to less healthy participants and/or increases the number of uninsured who then rely on more expensive emergency room care.
E. Overlapping coverage; Because few if any of the private for profit health care plans offer complete coverage, many participants enroll in more that one plan to get all the coverage they need. This includes high deductible plans for catastrophic events, high premium plans for preventative care, dental plans, vision plans, long term care plans, plans at work, sick pay plans, plans at school, plans included in automobile insurance (including uninsured motorist coverage), plans included in homeowners insurance, separate plans for each spouse, Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans health care and military health care. Any family or even any person can easily find themselves in need of more than one plan to get all the coverage they need even though those plans may well overlap in other coverage areas.
F. Legislation; Our fragmented health care finance system was created and is regulated by legislation. That legislation is full of inconsistencies and loopholes that allow fraud and abuse which increases costs. In addition, legislation allowing general and specific tax breaks and regulatory relief have increased corporate profits with no visible significant cost reductions for participants as exemplified by the Medicare Part D prescription insurance legislation which was written by the pharmaceutical lobby and has enriched the pharmaceutical and health care finance corporations. Additional legislation and regulation further complicates the fragmented system driving up the cost of administration.
G. Economies of Scale: The multiplicity of health care insurance plans reduce the purchasing power of those corporations providing the plans for prescription drugs, equipment, devices, supplies and services that they pay for compared to fewer plans with more participants each.
H. Economic Loss: The lack of universal health coverage and optimal health outcomes results in unnecessary lost work hours, reduced productivity and higher production costs than would be the case with a healthier work force.
Our fragmented health care financing system was created piece by piece in response to particular problems and incentives. The assembled pieces are not well integrated with each other or with the overall system. There are at least several cost spirals within the system that drive up costs and drive down coverage and outcomes. Just two examples are:
1. The rising cost of employer based for profit health insurance causes more and more companies to reduce or eliminate their participation in employee health care insurance. This reduces the size of the risk pools and increases the cost of health care to the remaining employers in the risk pools which causes more employers to reduce or eliminate participation.
2. The rising cost of health insurance forces many people to go without insurance which increases the number of uninsured who then rely on more expensive emergency room service for all their medical care. That cost for emergency room care is then passed on to the remaining participants in the risk pools which forces still more people to go without insurance. The increase in the number of uninsured also reduces the size of the risk pool which increases the cost to the remaining participants in the pool which forces even more people to become uninsured.
These and other cost spirals plus the other problems listed above are driving costs up and driving coverage and outcomes down. The basic problem lies in our very complicated and fragmented health care financing system. No corporation could function profitably if it was so disorganized and inefficient. Any further measures to repair specific problems in this system other than a unifying reorganization will only complicate, and possibly fragment it, further.
Pages