18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information states clearly that what Risen's informant has done is against the law. You may disagree that the information was classified in the first place but you, just like the rest of us, should have an interest in what the law says and seeing that it is enforced. In this particular case, if you have no interest in the enforcement of the law then we should just give up having any kind of national security interests.
Do you have any credible, sourced information "about Judge Lynn Adelmann and activities that he might have attended that involved liberal political donors, such as George Soros?" Do you?
My real guess is that you don't. My real guess is that, if you did, you would have put it in your comment. Instead, in the absence of credible and sourced information, you simply put a question out there from which people might well infer that Judge Adelmann had attended events funded by Mr. Soros.
That is how a smear starts. And the American Right-Wing has perfected the process. Without accusing someone of anything, they simply plant what seems to be an innocent rhetorical question and do so in such a way that those so inclined might well infer there is truth to it. Before you know it, it has become a meme and taken on a life of its own, though there may be zero substance to what it "charges."
Before you ask rhetorical questions such as this one, perhaps you'll do your own research. That way, if you can't dig up anything to use against the person you want to smear, perhaps you'll think twice about smearing him/her.
Now, let me ask again: Do you have any information about Judge Adelmann? If not, why not apologize for raising an issue that you can't even verify is actually an issue?
This article talks about Judge Randa and his attendance at some Koch funded activities.
I am wondering if the author has any information about Judge Lynn Adelmann and activities that he might have attended that involved liberal political donors, such as George soros?
In case this is an authentic question (doubtful): If you don't know by now, you are incapable of learning. The process of genetic modification itself is toxic, regardless of chemical use. Regardless, you are a corporate troll.
I am not surprised at all about the reported negotiations. I still wonder EXACTLY where the roughly 650,000 dollars went from the first probe. Legal fees for having to do almost nothing? Not a chance, not even for the highly regarded high-priced law firm from Chicago that Walker used.
Every time I see one of those bumper stickers that say "Proud of my Eagle Scout" I want to cry or vomit or both. Maybe a long time ago Walker was honorable enough to become a worthy Eagle Scout..........but these days...............sigh.
Pages