I questioned this too for my husband's visit. We were quoted what they verified with insurance and then for the follow up visit I was told there was a balance due from the original visit to the specialist. He literally spent less than 15 mins with us. His office told me he had indicated that was longer than a normal first visit on the paperwork for the insurance and now I have to come up with an extra 88 dollars in addition to 105 for the follow up to find out what is wrong with him ( after we shelled out 1200 for an MRI) What can I do?
This is an excellent story, but one clarification. The 12-hour hearing included parents, school board members, grandparents, teachers, advocates, administrators, businesspeople, etc. To characterize the opposition to this silliness as just teachers does "the movement" a disservice.
No surprise the public is clueless - Wisconsin was the test case for the legality of intentional bias in broadcasting and the FCC ruled there is no need to provide balance to the listening community for FCC licensees:
http://www.suewilsonreports.com/2014/05/may-19-2014-originally-published-at.html
Simply more liberal babbling. The last thing they want to do is to admit what the roots or this country were based on.
Pages