|
|
NavigationTopicsUser login |
politicsWeekly Radio Spin: Smokin' the CompetitionSubmitted by Judith Siers-Poisson on Fri, 05/16/2008 - 12:03.
Topics: activism | advertising | arts/culture | children | corporate social responsibility | corporations | crisis management | ethics | health | internet | lobbying | marketing | politics | public relations | race/ethnic issues | science | social justice | tobacco | U.S. government
Nestling into the British GovernmentTopics: children | corporate social responsibility | corporations | ethics | health | international | lobbying | politics | women
Bigger Isn't Always BetterTopics: advertising | media | politics | propaganda | right wing | U.S. Congress | U.S. government | Election 2008
No Rush to Protect the PublicTopics: advertising | corporations | health | marketing | pharmaceuticals | politics | science | U.S. Congress | U.S. government
Some U.S. Congresspeople want to limit direct to consumer marketing of drugs. Rep. Bart Stupak is head of the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce investigative panel. At a hearing to discuss specific ads by Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Schering-Plough, Stupak said that "It appears that we need to enforce significant restrictions on DTC (direct–to–consumer) ads to protect American consumers from manipulative commercials designed to mislead and deceive for the profit of pharmaceutical companies." Referring to the fact that other than New Zealand, the U.S. is the only country to allow direct to consumer advertising of drugs he added, "Pharmaceutical companies should consider it a privilege to be allowed to air DTC ads in this country. We should make sure that pharmaceuticals companies conduct themselves responsibly." The ranking Republican on the committee, John Shimkus of Illinois, said that since the Food and Drug Administration was just recently given oversight of drug ads, it is too soon for congressional intervention. But as CMD has reported previously, there is significant concern as to whether the FDA and other government agencies are able and willing to stand up to industry and government pressure. Where There's PR Smoke, There's Grassfire.org, DudeTopics: astroturf | environment | front groups | global warming | public relations | right wing | science
Columnist Dimitri Vassilaros received a news release about a grassroots "petition to stop climate alarmism" and attacking Al Gore's work. He checked it out and found that "for an organization that claims 'we are grassroots to the core,' Grassfire.org acts as if it is hiding a lot of Astroturf. The politically conservative nonprofit is happy to talk about its worthy online petition campaigns," but is "very tight-lipped about talking about itself. ... The Maxwell, Iowa, address for donations to the grassroots organization is clearly displayed on its Web site. But its 2006 IRS 990 form states its address is Bethesda, Md., near Washington, D.C." The SourceWatch article on Grassfire revealed its relationship to Craig Shirley and his "slick Washington-area PR firm, Shirley & Banister Public Affairs. ... When asked a few times about the organization's finances, [Grassfire's] Mr. De Jong first said he didn't know the size of the organization that he speaks for. He also said he 'could ask around' about that 990 form. When I offered to ask the bookkeeper for him, De Jong said, 'She will call, dude. Relax. I'll take care of it for you. I am a man of my word.' As of Thursday noon, no one had called this dude." Ohio Governor Snuffs out Ohio Anti-Smoking Foundation
Meet the Candidates: The Victors of the Indiana and North Carolina Congressional PrimariesSubmitted by Conor Kenny on Thu, 05/08/2008 - 14:48.
Topics: politics | U.S. Congress | Election 2008 While the presidential race is getting all the attention, voters in Indiana and North Carolina also selected their parties' nominees for their 22 House of Representatives seats and one Senate slot on Tuesday. Each seat's incumbent is running for reelection, but this is a turbulent election year, and the three high-school teachers, three attorneys, several small business owners and elected officials, and one TV weatherman challenging them could give them a run for their money. The Democrats are defending twelve House seats to the Republicans ten, plus Elizabeth Dole's seat in the Senate. Each candidate and incumbent has a profile within Congresspedia's Wiki the Vote project, which you can find at the Indiana and North Carolina portals, or through the full listing of the primary victors below. We need your help to find out more about these candidates, so remember that these profiles are editable by anyone and jump right in. You can always contact one of the staff editors for help. MoveOn and Fenton PR Launch Liberal Advertising ConsortiumTopics: advertising | left wing | marketing | media | politics | propaganda | women | Election 2008
AdAge reports that Fenton Communications and its client MoveOn.org have announced a politically liberal advertising consortium using corporate advertising executives and firms to "help change the playing field this year. ... At the moment it will go after presumptive Republican nominee Senator John McCain. ... [David Fenton] said the team would work for a variety of causes, not just MoveOn.org. Fenton also handles public relations for Global Green; Friends of the Earth; Bono's One Campaign; Refugees International; and Human Rights Watch, among others. 'Right now, the idea is to help win the election and talk about issues on [sic] global warming and women's rights,' he said." MoveOn's political strategist Tom Matzzie and its founder Wes Boyd also founded Campaign to Defend America, currently running advocacy TV ads against John McCain. Pentagon's Propaganda Documents Go Online, but Will the TV Networks Ever Report this Scandal?Submitted by John Stauber on Tue, 05/06/2008 - 13:53.
Topics: democracy | ethics | Iran | Iraq | journalism | lobbying | media | politics | propaganda | pundits | terrorism | third party technique | U.S. government | war/peace Eight thousand pages of documents related to the Pentagon's illegal propaganda campaign, known as the Pentagon military analyst program, are now online for the world to see, although in a format that makes it impossible to easily search them and therefore difficult to read and dissect. This trove includes the documents pried out of the Pentagon by David Barstow and used as the basis for his stunning investigation that appeared in the New York Times on April 20, 2008. The Pentagon program, which clearly violated US law against covert government propaganda, embedded more than 75 retired military officers -- most of them with financial ties to war contractors -- into the TV networks as "message surrogates" for the Bush Administration. To date, every major commercial TV network has failed to report this story, covering up their complicity and keeping the existence of this scandal from their audiences. Industry Encourages More Regulation, USDA DeclinesTopics: agriculture | animal rights | corporations | food safety | mad cow disease | politics | science | U.S. government
|
Weekly SpinRecent blog posts
The Politics and PR of Cervical CancerA four-article series by CMD's Associate Director, Judith Siers-Poisson. Upcoming events |