VP Role for Paul Ryan Has His Former Parish Priest Worried

The entrance to St. Mary Elementary School in Janesville, Wisconsin has two identical archways with contrasting inscriptions. One entrance says, "For God." The other says, "For Country." That is where Mitt Romney's vice presidential running mate, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, first merged his studies of government and religion as a young student.

And the priest who presides over the archways and the towering steeple of the Nativity of Mary says that Ryan's interpretation of Catholic teaching in national budgetary matters and his prospective vice presidential role have him "worried." Father Stephen Umhoefer told the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) that he supports a role for religion in the public square, but that Ryan's austerity budget and proposed steep cuts in social programs are inconsistent with the Catholic teachings that Ryan cites to justify the policies. "If he is following his conscience, he is doing the morally correct thing. But he shouldn't wrap himself in Catholic teaching because he is not using that [teaching] in what I would say is a balanced way," said Umhoefer.

Umhoefer, 72, has led the church since 2002 and was the Ryan family pastor until the family left for another Janesville parish a few years ago. Ryan's current parish is led by a priest who teaches on the diocese faculty under the deeply conservative Madison Bishop Robert Morlino, who characterizes Ryan's judgment as "in accord with all the teachings of the Church."

Ryan's Defense of Austerity Budget Kicks Up Controversy

Ryan's leadership as chair of the House Budget Committee and author of the "Path to Prosperity" Republican budget blueprint and the FY 2013 House Budget Resolution has become a lightning rod for criticism by other Catholic bishops, ecumenical groups, and lay leaders.

Nativity of Mary Parish, Janesville, WisconsinIn introducing Ryan to the nation as his running mate Saturday, Romney said that Ryan's beliefs "remain firmly rooted in Janesville, Wisconsin," and pointed to his life as a "faithful Catholic." If elected, Ryan would become the first Catholic Republican vice president in history. The Ryan budget, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 2012 but died in the Senate, would slash taxes on the rich and on corporations, while implementing massive cuts in social safety net programs. It would repeal Obamacare, cut Medicaid, transform Medicare into a voucher system, cut student loans, and end the Earned Income Tax Credit program for the poor, while reversing Wall Street financial reforms.

Standing alone, the harsh austerity budget was controversial enough. But in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network in April 2012, Ryan defended his budget as in conformity with Catholic social doctrine. "[T]he preferential option for the poor, which is one of the primary tenets of Catholic social teaching, means don't keep people poor, don't make people dependent on government so that they stay stuck in their station in life. Help people get out of poverty onto [a] life of independence," Ryan said.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops took sharp exception, calling on Congress to resist "for moral and human reasons" cuts to food and nutrition programs to the poor. The Conference called instead for "shared sacrifice ... including raising adequate revenues, eliminating unnecessary military and other spending, and addressing the long-term costs of health insurance and retirement programs fairly." Faculty at Georgetown University put it more bluntly in an open letter to Ryan: "Your budget appears to reflect the values of your favorite philosopher, Ayn Rand, rather than the Gospel of Jesus Christ."

Father Umhoefer followed the controversy from Janesville. He said in an extended interview that he had a "very friendly pastor-parishioner relationship" with Ryan, but that the two "never sat down and talked politics." He noted that he has not read in full the dense, 60-plus page Republican budget, but that he has reviewed the budget through a range of Catholic and ecumenical materials and media reports, and he shared the concerns expressed by the bishops.

"The Primary Question Is, How Does This Affect the Poor?"

For Umhoefer, the test of the budget is a simple one: "The first question is how does this affect the poor. And everything else follows from that. That doesn't mean it's a Republican or Democrat [question] -- you could argue that. But the primary question is how does this affect the poor?"

Umhoefer said that Ryan's lack of attention to the poor and the emphasis on individualism espoused by role models such as Ayn Rand concerned him. "Paul would say that the only way to save the country from a coming [fiscal] disaster is 'follow my plan.'" But according to Umhoefer, the problem is "you can't tell somebody that in ten years your economic situation is going to be just wonderful because meanwhile your kids may starve to death."

Umhoefer said that in Janesville, which lost some 5,000 jobs related to the auto industry after a GM plant closed in 2009, residents continue to seek emergency food and housing support and social service organizations have been running out of funds. A house across the street from the church sits with a red "condemned" sticker prominently on the door, and another house on the block has a sign that declares, "Price Reduced."

"The welfare check runs out and people are suffering now in ways that they haven't before," he said, noting that the church has hired two former auto workers with wages and benefits far below their former level.

St. Mary School, Janesville, WisconsinUmhoefer said that wealthy church members have offered support for shared sacrifice and revenue raising proposals such as the Warren Buffet rule that asks millionaires to avoid loopholes and pay a tax rate of 30 percent. "I can't always invite my neighbor over to dinner, but I ... need to pay a certain amount of taxes. And I need to vote to make sure taxes are used to help make sure that my neighbor isn't starving," he said.

Umhoefer also laments what he calls an excess of individualism in America that is sometimes abetted by politicians. He prepared for CMD a section of the church catechism, which states that the church "has refused to accept, in the practice of 'capitalism,' individualism and the absolute primacy of the law of the marketplace over human labor." Umhoefer said that he doesn't mean to accuse Ryan of choosing individualism as a creed over community, but that Ryan's promotion of Ayn Rand to his staff and others is "an alternative universe of which he is a member.... What I call an excessive attitude of individualism is doing a great deal of harm to us as a society because we are forgetting society values," said Umhoefer.

Priest to Ryan: "You Can't Just Pack Your Own Heat"

Umhoefer said that Ryan has also selectively presented to his audiences a Catholic concept of empowerment known as "subsidiarity." Ryan explained subsidiarity to the Christian Broadcasting Network as "not having big government crowd out civic society, but by having enough space in our communities so that we can interact with each other, and take care of people who are down and out in our communities."

Umhoefer said that he agrees with the "Nuns on the Bus," a group of liberal nuns who recently undertook a bus tour and visited Ryan's Janesville office to underscore the absurdity of Ryan's approach. "Just on food stamps alone, Congressman Ryan is wrong that the church can take care of this issue. The cuts that have been proposed and passed by the [U.S.] House are going to require every church, every synagogue, every mosque, every house of worship in the United States, each year for ten years, to each raise $50,000. It's impossible," said Sister Simone Campbell during the Janesville stop. CMD covered the Nuns on the Bus Tour and sought the interview with Umhoefer after the nuns presented an alternative "moral budget" in Janesville.

Reading from the catechism, Umhoefer explained that government "should support [local communities] in case of need and help to coordinate its activities with the activities of the rest of society, always with a view to the common good." He said that when subsidiarity lacks resources and coordination, government can fail when it is most needed. But sometimes we need to be rescued: "You can't just pack your own heat and protect your own building," he cautioned.

"What I wish for Paul -- he is so smart and so articulate and has made this whole budget, which he can defend on his own view ... of how the economy and politics work. I wish he wouldn't bring in the Catholic church. He doesn't need to if his economic and political argument are strong, and I'm sure he believes that they are."


Thanks for a sane and reasoned treatment of the difference between sovereign government debt and private debt. It's no secret why the "Great Depression" was so devastating. Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon, placed in his office during the infamous Harding Administration to enable Wall St. predators to have total freedom to fleece the unwary during the 20s, converted the Treasury Department into a cheering section for Mellon's campaign to remove the inheritance tax. Mellon's reaction to the crash was to propose: "liquidate labor" and "liquidate troubled assets"--so of course his Wall St. buddies could buy such assets for pennies on the dollar. "Liquidate labor" speaks for itself. President Hoover, unfairly blamed for the depth of the depression, was so angry at Mellon, whom he couldn't politically get rid of, that the two men were not on speaking terms as the situation deteriorated. The "Mellon Trust", the cash cow which Mellon and his right-wing heirs have been milking for more than a century, was built by Andrew Mellon and his brother Richard by forcing their way into control of promising firms to which they had loaned start-up capital. Paul Ryan is not only a disciple of Ayn Rand, but Andrew Mellon. Get set for a wild ride, should Ryan/Romney get the keys.

The question raised is exactly what the church of the radical, inclusive Jesus should be asking. Catholic bishops have placed themselves with the rich and the powerful, sad to say. Years ago, when the pedophile coverup was brought into the light of day, the bishops, as a group, lost credibility and respect. I read or listen to their words and then ask myself, "does this fit with Mt. 25--whatsoever you do...." The word of this group of leaders seldom does, I'm sorry to say. As a cradle Catholic, I now send my church contributions directly to either Catholic Relief Services or to the Presentation Sisters for their work with the poor and vulnerable. If only more priests would speak our, risk being sent to the back of beyond by the bishop, but "speak truth to power", Catholics would be inspired, not turned off by their beloved religion. I keep my faith, tho I've lost my religion because of the words of bishops, especially these past 7 months.

The US Catholic bishops have consistently lobbied Congress AGAINST the Ryan budget. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/222591-rep-paul-ryan-spars-with-us-bishops-over-budget and http://www.usccb.org/news/2012/12-063.cfm. That's the record, no matter what Paul Ryan and the GOP may say. And, yes, it was horrible of the bishops to cover up pedophiles. But the record shows that they oppose the GOP on the budget -- and on our two wars and on immigration and on the environment and on the death penalty and on consumer protection and on labor rights...

Ad a Brit (which makes me European) and a Catholic (of Polish stock) I and most Europeans find these arguments put forward by Ryan utterly ridiculous. Firstly the state and The Church should always seek to protect the poorest and most vunarable in society something I to believe the Nuns which taught me would back fully. To cut welfare payments and even the low level of health care available is tantamount to leaving people to die in the streets and not something that even the most Conservative of governments would even consider over here. Secondly why does Religion have to come into the argument when it is based on fiscal policy? It seems ludicrousthat you should or would make any mention of Religion in such a stance. I see also that there is alot of argument on the pro-life issue my simple question So What? Every country has an abortion law including those most Catholic of countries such as France and Italy. This should not be seen as a justifiable reason for voting for a candidate that wishes to push the poor aside and conravene the most basic teachings of The Church he proclaims so loudly to follow

I am not sure what to make of your comment here. It would have to be very tongue in cheek and sarcastic. Britain is slowly catching up with America on the Healthcare cuts being made the austerity measures that are creeping in are already causing hardship to thousands and they haven't even begun to take full effect yet. People are being led by the mainstream mediato believe that everyone on benefits is either lazy and scrounging or on the fiddle. Disabled people are being told they must find work even though a lot of them are mentally unfit because the tests applied to them are about physical capability. Full time Jobs are being replaced with part time posts which is useless andpeople are being told they will have to work for benefit. How I see it is, if there is work for benefit then that work should exist for pay. Why should the taxpayer fund workers at Tesco and companies like that I know the arguements I have heard them all but it doesn't make sense. These unpaid workers will be replacing paid workers Companies Like Tesco who avoid paying taxes get free workers so end up noy paying wages. if people dont get wages they don't pay taxes. This country is doomed because no taxes more austerity downward spiral

It's interesting how many people want no part of Ryan and his proposed budget. Now I understand the one issue voters who see his anti abortion stance and get happy but his proposed budget goes beyond anything preached in any church, I've heard of. By Ryan's logic, the Good Samaritan was a sucker and should have left the man on the side of the road because then he would have found the strength to lift himself from the dirt.

My questions to all of your comments on this article is this: would you rather watch America go broke with a Dictator in the White HOuse, or would you be more inclined to allow these two known Americans to try their hands at getting our deficit back to save our America for our Children and contain FREEDOM as well??? Do you want more of the same reckless spending and taking the money out of American workers who still have a job as well as the rich and provide food, housing, etc. to immigrants who aren't even Citizens of the United States? I'm sorry, I am retired and I know I would be upset if I had to support every stray dog, cat, horse, pony or illegal immigrant on the streets ........just because they are here.

So tell me. I honestly don't get it. If we need more money, why do we keep giving tax cuts to the wealthiest among us. I have yet to see the trickle down thing work. The job makers just aren't doing their part.

catholic universal churches need to start paying taxes for their voice on subjects that matter to women, children, minorities (now the white are the minority I believe if truth be told) free speech, not hate speech would be a nice value to reach for the stars, and let's just not keep the secrets how much lawyers have cost your parishioners of all faiths to keep those secrets to save face. Cover ups make societies sick, and dictators are not in this White House, and no Columbus didn't discover, he was lost and needed to ask directions from the Natives of this land. And one more think on my mind "Custer died for our THIEVERY and their SELF defense, or stand their (red Man) land. Debbie Harris Fulton Member of Anti WAR, EQUAL RIGHTS, and HATE CRIMES need to be prosecuted, Womens equality and womens choices for their HEALTH CARE. AMEN and amen...