To trolls-Monsanto's own research, don't attack me! During its years investigating glyphosate’s bioactivity, Monsanto conducted hundreds of trials on mice, rats, beagle dogs, rabbits and other life.The EPA has known this since 1980 and functions as a department of the biotech industry not to protect Americans. Among the many cancers and diseases Monsanto’s own research found associated with glyphosate are:
Adenoma cancer-pituitary gland,
Glioma tumors-brain,
Reticular cell sarcomas-heart,
Malignant tumors-lungs,
Salivary mandibular reticular cell carcinoma,
Metastatic sarcomas-lymph gland
Prostate carcinoma,
Cancer of the bladder,
Thyroid carcinoma,
Adrenal reticulum cell sarcomas,
Cortical adenomas,
Basal cell squamous skin tumors,
In female mammals-cancers of the lung, liver, thymus, stomach, bladder adrenal glands, ovaries, colon, uterus, parathyroid and mammary glands.
Samsel and Seneff also noticed that Monsanto had conducted many long-term studies.
To David Berman: I've been reading "Lies Incorporated" and it was the first time I had heard of your father. Quite a shock. I honor you for telling the truth about your father and I'm sorry for the pain his actions have caused you. You are not responsible for what he has done and is doing. Live in beauty and walk in harmony.
If you examine the recent concern about glyphosate safety you will see that no government agency that has assessed glyphosate safety says its a carcinogen. EPA and EU have recently reviewed again (EU took 4 years) and say it is not a carcinogen. The WHO has 4 groups that opined on glyphosate safety the activists only quote one of the 4 - they took 4 HOURS and put it into the same risk category as processed meats and working nights or in a barber shop (I am not kidding). This hazard assessment has spread like wild fire with a bunch of ill informed politicians jumping on it as proof it causes cancer. The other 3 parts of WHO say its fine (that is ignored). 4 HOURS is a much more reliable review than 4 YEARs apparently. Even the WHO group who had a negative view said this is a hazard assessment and risk is hazard x dose x exposure and their assessment should be used to legislate. Another result of this is lawyers salivating and trying to make money suing Monsanto but they have failed.
Pages