Recent comments

  • Reply to: Backgrounder: the History of the NRA/ALEC Gun Agenda   11 years 8 months ago
    having more than 30 years of owning handguns, i can only state that they are needed for protection from the criminals, who always have them
  • Reply to: Running Scared: ALEC Anticipating an IRS Audit?   11 years 8 months ago
    The activities of this organization are so shady that I'm sure every real record was destroyed long ago. It's very convenient for some in the organization as they will have to find places to hide huge amounts of money quickly, allowing them access to huge amounts of money. Should they have to pay taxes on all those untaxed donations, that should have given to real charities, they may be bankrupt and I'll bet that ever since Romney lost, they have been sealing all the leaks on their second set of books. Maybe the FBI should follow the money as they channel it to other places to illegally influence our Congressmen. ALEC is like Congress' own Playboy Club. Fine wine, liquor, cigars and plenty of entertainment. It's apparent that many of the remaining members of Congress that are still a part of ALEC, are the most brazen and laziest. Who will make up their bills for Congress if ALEC doesn't do it for them? And if I was married to any of those male chauvinist pigs, I'be making their life miserable for years to come. I wonder what they told their wives they were doing while at these get-togethers? New Orleans, Vegas . . .
  • Reply to: The Latest Effort to Fix Election Results: Rig the Electoral College   11 years 8 months ago
    The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps. There would no longer be a handful of 'battleground' states where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in 80% of the states that now are just 'spectators' and ignored after the conventions. When the bill is enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes– enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538), all the electoral votes from the enacting states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC. The presidential election system that we have today was not designed, anticipated, or favored by the Founding Fathers but, instead, is the product of decades of evolutionary change precipitated by the emergence of political parties and enactment by 48 states of winner-take-all laws, not mentioned, much less endorsed, in the Constitution. The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for President. Historically, virtually all of the major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action. In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). Support for a national popular vote is strong among Republicans, Democrats, and Independent voters, as well as every demographic group in virtually every state surveyed in recent polls in recent closely divided Battleground states: CO – 68%, FL – 78%, IA 75%, MI – 73%, MO – 70%, NH – 69%, NV – 72%, NM– 76%, NC – 74%, OH – 70%, PA – 78%, VA – 74%, and WI – 71%; in Small states (3 to 5 electoral votes): AK – 70%, DC – 76%, DE – 75%, ID – 77%, ME – 77%, MT – 72%, NE 74%, NH – 69%, NV – 72%, NM – 76%, OK – 81%, RI – 74%, SD – 71%, UT – 70%, VT – 75%, WV – 81%, and WY – 69%; in Southern and Border states: AR – 80%, KY- 80%, MS – 77%, MO – 70%, NC – 74%, OK – 81%, SC – 71%, TN – 83%, VA – 74%, and WV – 81%; and in other states polled: AZ – 67%, CA – 70%, CT – 74%, MA – 73%, MN – 75%, NY – 79%, OR – 76%, and WA – 77%. Americans believe that the candidate who receives the most votes should win. The bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers in 21 states with 243 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 9 jurisdictions with 132 electoral votes - 49% of the 270 necessary to go into effect. NationalPopularVote Follow National Popular Vote on Facebook via NationalPopularVoteInc
  • Reply to: The Latest Effort to Fix Election Results: Rig the Electoral College   11 years 8 months ago
    Despite what you wish to imply, Republicans held five of Wisconsin's eight congressional districts prior to the most recent redistricting, and simply continue to hold five of eight after redistricting. And how was it that Republicans were able to redistrict on their terms? They held both state houses prior to redistricting. Please try to be a little more honest in your reporting.
  • Reply to: The Latest Effort to Fix Election Results: Rig the Electoral College   11 years 8 months ago
    Read the US Constitution. The states are free to decide how to apportion their delegates to the Electoral College. Don't like it? Amend the Constitution. It's perfectly legal.

Pages