you know someone told me to check out this website because i would not believe it. they were right.
Ms Farsetta must think that the entire world is populated by idiots unable to determine truth.
you know the saying......believe half of what you ......
i think you need to give us credit for being smart and stop worrrying the fcc about stuff that doesn't matter. there are plenty of world matters that could use your energy. maybe you should take up another cause.
mary elizabeth mahoney
I don't understand why you are so angry. I get news about medical advancements in the newspaper also. I imagine the newspaper got their information about the medical advancement from a press release from a pr person, right? Isn't a vnr only a video version of a press release?
I think the viewer/reader has the capability to determine the validity of the medical information. She or he will only go to their doctor to ask whether the doctor thinks this is good for their situation. Right?
The internet article can be found at
http://www.gregpalast.com/bushs-new-us-attorney-a-criminal/
The original BBC Television story can be seen at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkvWkwv7UVo - Greg Palast’s YouTube channel.
Summary: In 2004, while Timothy Griffin was Research Director for the Republican National Committee, he allegedly sent a series of emails to Republican operatives that may have contained "caging" lists, lists of minority voters that were targeted for having their vote challenged on election day.
So although Griffin is mostly known as Karl Rove's lackey, he may have committed felonies on behalf of the RNC in 2004. Based on Palast's reporting, it certainly seems plausible that Bush wanted to reward his loyalty but didn't want him facing a potentially hostile Congressional confirmation.
"IT'S OBVIOUS THE PROSICUTER WAS TRYING TO BRING DOWN THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE SO CALLED "INVESTIGATION" WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A VEHICLE TO THAT END!!!"
Funny, there are plenty of folks who think the exact opposite is obvious -- that by targeting Libby and only Libby, Fitzgerald cooperated with the Bush-Cheney regime's damage-control effort.
You pays your money and you makes your choice. The less money you pays, the more choices you gets.
P.S.: Richard Armitage a Democrat? Can you cite a source for that? I couldn't find anything to corroborate it.
I don't understand why you are so angry. I get news about medical advancements in the newspaper also. I imagine the newspaper got their information about the medical advancement from a press release from a pr person, right? Isn't a vnr only a video version of a press release?
I think the viewer/reader has the capability to determine the validity of the medical information. She or he will only go to their doctor to ask whether the doctor thinks this is good for their situation. Right?
So what is the problem?
Mary Elizabeth Mahoney
"IT'S OBVIOUS THE PROSICUTER WAS TRYING TO BRING DOWN THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE SO CALLED "INVESTIGATION" WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A VEHICLE TO THAT END!!!"
Funny, there are plenty of folks who think the exact opposite is obvious -- that by targeting Libby and only Libby, Fitzgerald cooperated with the Bush-Cheney regime's damage-control effort.
You pays your money and you makes your choice. The less money you pays, the more choices you gets.
P.S.: Richard Armitage a Democrat? Can you cite a source for that? I couldn't find anything to corroborate it.
Pages