I so agree with you, Greg Thoms. In my experience it is usually the people who do the least and don't participate in the union and are constantly complaining who are the first to run to the union when they need representation. It is not fair that a union should have to represent people who don't pay dues. It is very interesting that right wing organizations often have names that are the opposite of what they are really advocating for. Right to Work. Hmmmm--what it really does is increase poverty and unemployment, because there is no job security without union protection. The complete title should read, "Right to Work for the Lowest Possible Wage to be Determined by the Employer."
Have a look at Alberta Darling's district. It is a pure racially motivated redistricting that can be categorized simply as "draw a line around the black people."
The government and different bodies have figured this out long ago. Your story is just the tip of a HUGE iceberg.
A big part of our tax dollars also go to fund a program under United States Code 42 where the feds "commission" the states for creating and maintaining a program for administering support. While that on the surface is a good noble cause on can't ignore the reality that the state employed judges have a huge conflict of interest when they use their often wielded power to impute otherwise inappropriate income on divorced fathers specifically for the purpose of creating a deadbeat when they know their decision is financially unreasonable and unattainable by the father. Since the judge works for the state, the judges employer (the State) is commissioned with MILLIONS of dollars from the Feds annually. It's a double edge sword. We all want true deadbeats to be caught but a larger percentage of the time than not it's a situation absolutely CREATED by State employed Judges (using discretion and bench law) specifically to create a huge profit for their boss, the State. USC 42, sections 658 and related sections spell this out clearly. Since it's covered under the guise of dead beats, noone looks at it and it's just business as usual for the judges, courts, and States.
This sad destruction of families is a sham that's been expertly carried out for years. Who pays the bill for it? We, the tax payer pay the feds for the monies that they send to the states in the form of "commissions". This extra profit the states get to keep is a better than a tax because they don't have to declare it to Joe taxpayer and they can certainly hide it by declaring they're doing society a favor by tracking down bad guys, even most aren't bad dads or bad people, just victims to state sanctioned dad-witchs hunt for profit. The Feds love it because it also put into place under USC 42, section 666 a monitoring system that gives them GREAT power to monitor and evan take away licenses (hunting, gun, fishing, driving, doctor, CPA), passports for travel (even if its for their job) of those men that fall to the demise of the State Judges overreach for profit. This ties nicely into federal monitoring of our individual e-mails, accounts, and phone information.
I'm sure there are more scams out there that we don't even know about. You've just found one of many. Thanks for the article!
It is weird how the same exact dollars that magically educate kids in private schools suddenly become a useless expense when someone wants them used to educate public school kids.
The government and different bodies have figured this out long ago. Your story is just the tip of a HUGE iceberg.
A big part of our tax dollars also go to fund a program under United States Code 42 where the feds "commission" the states for creating and maintaining a program for administering support. While that on the surface is a good noble cause on can't ignore the reality that the state employed judges have a huge conflict of interest when they use their often wielded power to impute otherwise inappropriate income on divorced fathers specifically for the purpose of creating a deadbeat when they know their decision is financially unreasonable and unattainable by the father. Since the judge works for the state, the judges employer (the State) is commissioned with MILLIONS of dollars from the Feds annually. It's a double edge sword. We all want true deadbeats to be caught but a larger percentage of the time than not it's a situation absolutely CREATED by State employed Judges (using discretion and bench law) specifically to create a huge profit for their boss, the State. USC 42, sections 658 and related sections spell this out clearly. Since it's covered under the guise of dead beats, noone looks at it and it's just business as usual for the judges, courts, and States.
This sad destruction of families is a sham that's been expertly carried out for years. Who pays the bill for it? We, the tax payer pay the feds for the monies that they send to the states in the form of "commissions". This extra profit the states get to keep is a better than a tax because they don't have to declare it to Joe taxpayer and they can certainly hide it by declaring they're doing society a favor by tracking down bad guys, even most aren't bad dads or bad people, just victims to state sanctioned dad-witchs hunt for profit. The Feds love it because it also put into place under USC 42, section 666 a monitoring system that gives them GREAT power to monitor and evan take away licenses (hunting, gun, fishing, driving, doctor, CPA), passports for travel (even if its for their job) of those men that fall to the demise of the State Judges overreach for profit. This ties nicely into federal monitoring of our individual e-mails, accounts, and phone information.
I'm sure there are more scams out there that we don't even know about. You've just found one of many. Thanks for the article!
Pages