Recent comments

  • Reply to: The Army's Religious Test   14 years 5 months ago

    ...nothing new there. This is just a new way for them to make sure they have more sheep than free thinkers. However, in it's core lies weakness. An atheist soldier IMO is probably just as equally valuable or even more valuable. He won't think twice about eliminating the enemy when necessary.

  • Reply to: Egyptian Protests Expose Fraudulent U.S. "Spreading Democracy" Meme   14 years 5 months ago
    Thanks Steve, you have put words to what I have been cringing from this last week. Watching/hearing Obama talk the hypocracy of 'The Good-Ship-USA'.
  • Reply to: Only People Can Vote -- Only People Should Finance Campaigns   14 years 5 months ago
    consider more narrowly defining "person", leave out natural which means nothing, to "only persons, being living, breathing human beings,
  • Reply to: Soft Drink Industry Using Smokin' PR   14 years 5 months ago

    Note how AAFT has implemented SEO to make sure that we have to dig at least three pages deep on the Google search to find a page with information showing us who is behind this front group - shouldn't there be a term, like "buried in the astroweeds" for this type of action?"

  • Reply to: Only People Can Vote -- Only People Should Finance Campaigns   14 years 5 months ago
    the word 'natural' must be there because of the history of corporate personhood, 'natural' person being the legal term for a human being and 'artificial' person for a corporation. read thom hartmann's 'unequal protection' if you want a good historical overview of corporate personhood in america. as for union donations, they were included in the citizens united decision and you're absolutely right in thinking that it's bad news right along with corporate moneyspeech. money is not speech, simple as that.

Pages