Submitted by Diane Farsetta on
FedEx's new "multimillion-dollar marketing campaign" doesn't tout the delivery company's service or speed. It accuses rival United Parcel Service (UPS) of receiving a government bailout. FedEx's website BrownBailout.com claims UPS is "quietly seeking a Congressional bailout designed to limit competition for overnight deliveries." One marketing executive said the campaign may backfire on FedEx, as "this is clearly not a bailout as most consumers and business people would define it, which is writing a check to a troubled business." At issue is "a provision in a Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill" that would reclassify some FedEx employees under the National Labor Relations Act, making it easier for them to form unions. UPS, which is "heavily unionized," is already classified under the Act. UPS spokesman Malcolm Berkley said that FedEx "uses the fact of the labor law it is currently under inappropriately as a lever when talking to UPS customers, particularly when we're negotiating our contracts." UPS isn't responding to the FedEx campaign, but the Teamsters union, which represents 240,000 UPS workers, is. A Teamsters press release accuses FedEx CEO Fred Smith of spending "millions of dollars on misleading ad campaigns and high-priced lobbyists [rather] than allow[ing] workers a real chance to form a union."
Comments
Anonymous replied on Permalink
fedex employees make about
fedex employees make about 12 dollars less per hour where did you get your info anyway
Anonymous replied on Permalink
fedex emplyees make less
This statement is untrue. As a fedex employee we don't need a union we already have the best benefits and pay in the system. Why would we need to give up some of our pay for a fat cat to sit in a chair and do nothing? Exactly!!!we already pay enough as it is in taxes and everything else.. So blogger get your statement true before you write it. WE DONT NEED A UNION PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gary V. Armstrong replied on Permalink
Union vs. not...
It proven that being a unionised employee is far superior to not being one. There is no debate. It was said that unions are an obsolete idea. At the rate business is screwing over American employees, visa vi making them part-time, low wages and outsourcing...the idea of unions are very much in vogue. I'm not a union employee or even a lobbyist. Just someone who understands history and the mentality of big business real well. Power and profits are the name of the game. They have their organisers/lobbyists. What do they have against the workers having theirs? Oh...that's right! They might have a half-way effective way to fight back. Damn!!
Pages