Recent comments

Is the unemployment rate in this country not high enough for Issa? If you put these people out of jobs and they cannot find another job the rate increases. He wants to cut salaries, jobs, number of days mail is delivered. This guy lives in a cave. He says he wants to save the government money. Surprise the Post Office does not get any money from the Federal Governmnt it gets its money from the sale of stamps and services. If he was really serious about saving the government money why doesnt he take a cut in pay along with the other rich republicans in office. He wont because its another ploy by the republicans to do away with the middle class worker. They only want two classes of people in this country the rich and the poor and by putting postal workers out of jobs they increase the poor working class. Issa needs to find something else to do with all his spare time and leave the post office and its employees alone.

Mr. O'Dwyer has never been a paid or unpaid staff member of PRWatch.org. CMD recently updated the staff list to be more accurate, since you drew it to our attention that it was inaccurate. Our system automatically lists authorship of "Anonymous" for people writing for PRWatch who are not entered into our staff list. We listed Mr. O'Dwyer to permit us to correctly attribute authorship of a piece he had written that we re-posted. Sorry, but nothing nefarious there. Just trying to deal with the limitations of software. And I've read the 23 page letter, and it is just overdone as your comments here. The letter, just like your comments here, avoids addressing the questions Mr. O'Dwyer are I are asking, and our concerns that PRSA is following the PR profession by hiding more of its operations from the public and increasingly operating unethically. Why are you unwilling to disclose the names of PRSA members, even to other members? Why are you trying to limit public knowledge about how PRSA operates? Why are you trying to limit input from PRSA members by using listen-only teleconferences? Why won't you disclose the salary of your group's CEO? Why won't you freely allow the public to cover the proceedings of your meetings? What does PRSA have to hide? I haven't seen answers to any of these questions in your responses. Those are the questions we'd like to have answered.