Mr. Obama had people pay $35,000 to dine with him last nite, how in the world did you middle class dems afford this much money and how did you poor dem people afford it? or was it the rich and the lobbiest and wall street and big union people that bought these exspensive dinners? I know it had to be the middle class and the poor democrats because Mr. Obama is alway talking about how he is trying to help the middle class and the poor, he is always talking bad about the rich the lobbeist and <strong><a href="http://cashadvancesus.com/protesters-occupy-wall-street/">Wall Street</a></strong> so i know they weren't there, Please explain this to me, im confused...dont give a thumbs down and please dont just call me names, just help me to understand"
Who studied history, must remember some details about slaveholding system. People had to toil hard for a little piece of bread and a piece of roof above their heads. Also Middle Ages'people paid a huge tributes to their authorities. Has anything changed since that time??? In fact, nothing has changed!Of course, we are free now, we have some rights. But everything is the same - work hard for food and living, having a week off once in 3 years. And as in the Middle Ages we pay tributes to our authorities in sort of taxes and percentages for installment payday loans.
consumers were unmistakably vocal about single payor. No one in their right mind could possibly believe that the cost to administrate a single universally understood plan could not save billions over the costs to administrate hundreds of different plans designed, each in part, to obfiscate coverage and payment terms.
consumers directed the vocal message clearly to the white house and the white house summarily folded like an origami bird at the first hint of industry pressure. It is becoming prohibitively naive to dilude oneself any further into believing that anyone in d.c. has any interest in improving the lot of 95% of us. The best way to impliment the remaining dismal excuse for a window dressing is to scrap it. Perhaps we'll pick this up again as part of a larger overhaul of the wretched excess and profain dealing in the insurance industry.
the best way for media to help is to stop promoting the disinformation that there is something to be gained by roughly 95% of us for playing along with this hypocracy-laced (?hypocratic?) side show lie. media needs to do a much better job listening as well.
Actually, the examples you mentioned obviously work by using categories, not by using any advanced artificial intelligence (because advanced artificial intelligence is still science fiction and all these things can be done by using categories). So it seems like Siri just doesn't include a category for abortion or family planning yet. And Siri is still in Beta stage (i.E. it is an unfinished product), so this doesn't have to have any political reason. Or as another anonymous commenttor said: by the same logic, Siri also opposes spanish speakers.
Actually, the examples you mentioned obviously work by using categories, not by using any advanced artificial intelligence (because advanced artificial intelligence is still science fiction and all these things can be done by using categories). So it seems like Siri just doesn't include a category for abortion or family planning yet. And Siri is still in Beta stage (i.E. it is an unfinished product), so this doesn't have to have any political reason. Or as another anonymous commenttor said: by the same logic, Siri also opposes spanish speakers.
Pages