A woman's body? Assuming it's consensual, didn't the woman already make the decision about her body?
An unborn baby--call it a fetus if you will--has its own beating heart, its own brain, its own nervous syste. Indeed, there can be no argument that it is a living being with its own human DNA, distinct and separate from the mother.
So the argument that killing an unborn baby is a personal decision that a woman makes that affects no one but herself is simply false. Or, if the one who opines is at all educated, a lie.
If you want to make the case that it's OK to terminate human life in order to help your home financial situation, fine. But don't try to convince me that the mother is the innocent victim and the unborn baby is an evil, nonhuman parasite.
Neither ethics nor science can support that argument. An inconvenient truth, perhaps?
I don't get you, whole foods are the good guys. Its not their fault that people don't know the difference between "natural" and "certified organic". Do you trust whats on the shelves at the supermarket? Then why not question this place too? They don't claim to be a 100% organic place. Don't go against someone who's trying to help!
I don't get you, whole foods are the good guys. Its not their fault that people don't know the difference between "natural" and "certified organic". Do you trust whats on the shelves at the supermarket? Then why not question this place too? They don't claim to be a 100% organic place. Don't go against someone who's trying to help!
Pages