The statute demands 501 C4 activities be EXCLUSIVELY devoted to the public welfare.
Why is it the media and all complaintants can even question the issue?
Why is that fact not quoted every time the discussion is approached??
Why isn't our brave Congressional Committee facing that fact and ending the controversy?
Davis Koch is, I believe, singled out because he has been for decades using his wealth to undermine democracy more than any other billionaire. He is different and highly dangerous because his wealth is so massive and such means, and the power and influence it buys, are a major threat to American democracy. Photographed frequently at New York social events, and accompanied by his trophy wife, he always registers a sly and sinister smile, a factor that exemplifies an individual who hides the dirty secrets of the human spirit.
Calling PBS all the names you used shows you don't know what you're talking about. PBS has very good shows...Nature, NOVA, Masterpiece... just to name a few...and has educated many on many subjects way before History Channel, Discovery, NatGeo, "Arts & Entertainment," Science Channel. Give credit where credit is due. I'll assume you're too young to remember pre-1990 TV.
"reportedly not very good?" reported by whom? One of the Koch Brothers is a major supporter of NOVA. NOVA canned a proposed episode on global warming. Coincidence? I doubt it. The continuing relationship between PBS and these vultures decreases their credibility a thousand fold.
Pages