Recent comments

  • Reply to: "Vets for Freedom" Fight for Rove and Lieberman   18 years 1 week ago
    Given that the RNC is moving its operatives to support Lieberman, I think you all'd be interested in some work we did last week at ePluribusMedia. This is the teaser I've used to point folks at the article which tracked the events we documented as Lieberman's fate rolled out of the primary. <blockquote>When Karl Rove mixes it up with Becki Donatelli @ Campaign Solutions, what do you get? A sloppy kiss by proxy?! Five days before the CT primary, registration of the key domains. The night Joe Lieberman happily concedes and announces his run as an independent Democrat, ISupportJoe.com shows up briefly on Donatelli's IP address and then gets moved to a cheap domain hoster presumably to put it some distance from the obviously GOP operative. Check out ISupportJoe.com - <a href="http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2006/8/9/221126/7489"><i>Sealed with a Kiss: Lieberman's "Roving" Independence</i></a> at ePluribusMedia. </blockquote> <hr> <a href="http://epluribusmedia.org/">ePluribus Media</a>. Genuinely homegrown, want to help research, edit, fact-check or write? Just talk about it in the <a href="http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/">ePluribus Community</a>.
  • Reply to: "Vets for Freedom" Fight for Rove and Lieberman   18 years 1 week ago
    I don't know the poster to who you're responding, heck, I don't know you. But one of the reasons I keep coming back to Sourcewatch and affiliates is the goal of blowing away the smokescreen generated by the noise machine. I think you're probably correct, as I've quoted you on the subject line. The only thing needed for a successful conjob as they pulled off is establishing control of our perception long enough to manage through the critical decision period. Doesn't matter if the assertion is true since it's only gotta float long enough to tweak Americans' perceptions in the 'right' direction. That's why so many thank God for our short attention span. Hell, remember Scanlon's prescription for the 'wackos' Reed delivered to their services, God's a great tool too! I think some people didn't get the followup message about not needing to resolve the allegations: <i>Hey, it's over.</i> 'Mission accomplished!' <a href="http://epluribusmedia.org/">ePluribus Media</a>. Genuinely homegrown, want to help research, edit, fact-check or write? Just talk about it in the <a href="http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/">ePluribus Community</a>.
  • Reply to: "Vets for Freedom" Fight for Rove and Lieberman   18 years 2 weeks ago
    Hey, it's over. The whole world knows that the SBVFT is a scam so why not join reality and become a reasonable person but then you're probably not interested in the truth. You just want to scam as many as you can to support your addiction to BS, money and power. In other words I think you're just a plant and not really anything but a liar, hypocrit and NEO-CON scumbag pulled out of GW's pokmemon. age enhances wisdom, sometimes.
  • Reply to: CMD's 'Fake TV News' Report Fuels FCC Investigation   18 years 2 weeks ago

    What exactly does the FCC expect the broadcasters to say? "No we didn't"?
    Thats like the police doing an investigation on themselves.

    The "Corporate" Broadcasters will deny as did Big Oil when asked if they were price gouging.

    Obviously the Government thinks we are stupid and we must be if we allow these white washes to continue.

    David

  • Reply to: "Vets for Freedom" Fight for Rove and Lieberman   18 years 2 weeks ago
    *Jon Lender, [http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-senate0815.artaug15,0,1333902.story?coll=hc-headlines-politics-state "'Vets For Freedom' Creates Stir. Group With GOP Ties Backs Lieberman; White House Declines To Endorse Schlesinger,"] ''Hartford Courtant'' (CT), August 15, 2006. *Brian Lockhart, [http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/local/scn-sa-nor.vets2aug15,0,4908456.story?coll=stam-news-local-headlines "Iraq veterans group supports Lieberman,"] ''The Advocate'' (Stamford, CT), August 15, 2006. *Jonathan Darman, [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14323596/page/2/ "Campaign 2006: A Hawk Stays Aloft. The politics of terror may just keep Joe Lieberman in office,"] ''Newsweek'' (MSNBC), August 21-28, 2006 (issue).

Pages