<blockquote>Dear Member,
The war in Iraq is entering its fifth year, and the presidential primary
season is well underway. As in 2006, Iraq will surely be the top issue in
the upcoming election, but many people are still getting to know where the
candidates stand on ending the war.
We've created a website to describe their positions, and the exciting part
is that the research on the candidates will not come from "experts" but
from members. It's kind of like Wikipedia, where everyone can contribute.
That's where you come in. We need volunteers to fill the site with
information. You might spend an hour looking at a candidate's historical
statements on the war and put them in a timeline. Or you could search for
speeches on the topic by all the candidates and post any video you find.
Putting all of this information in one place will really help MoveOn
members understand who best represents their views, and it will be fun!
Can you pitch in an hour or two to help? </blockquote>
****************
Wow, that's exciting!
Oh, wait...I forgot we already have Congresspedia.
MoveOn confirmed to me that about 126,000 of their 3.2 million members voted in their survey. Not only was the survey slanted, 96% of the MoveOn members didn't vote. No doubt the vast majority ignored the email and didn't even open it. This is the opposite of democracy and accountability.
Anyone see any irony in Mr. Arnot's past employment as a pig farm apologist? Evidently, he's skilled in making the case for embracing that which stinks to high heaven.
-- And be sure to note the P.S.:
<blockquote>Dear MoveOn member,
The results are in from our poll on whether to support Speaker Pelosi's
proposal on Iraq: 84.6% of MoveOn members voted to support the bill. 9.2%
said they weren't sure and 6.2% voted to oppose it.
This note from Ruel B. in California seems to sum up what most MoveOn
members feel: "I agree it may not go far enough, but it is a first step.
Hopefully, the first step on the road to getting out of Iraq."
The media has spent a lot of time focusing on divisions between the
Democrats. But the biggest division is between President Bush, who says
he'll veto any timetable for exit, and the voters, who want one. It's
important for the media to understand this stark contrast---can you write
a letter to the editor of your local paper? Just click below:
http://pol.moveon.org/lte?campaign_id=72&id=10048-7773210-bwe3ih&t=3
Over the last weeks, progressive members of Congress worked to make this
Iraq bill a real step forward. And they succeeded, for the first time, in
getting a bill with a timetable. MoveOn members have provided important
support for these progressive leaders.
In just the last few days, MoveOn members have sent letters, organized
petition deliveries, supported ads, and made calls pushing for an end to
this war. Yesterday, we received this note of thanks from Congresswoman
Jan Schakowsky, addressed to MoveOn members:
"Thanks for everything you've done to help build the public support for
Congress acting to end the war in Iraq. As someone who voted against the
war, and as a founder of the Out of Iraq caucus, I would have preferred to
redeploy our troops long ago. I am pleased, however, that for the first
time, the debate is no longer about "if" but rather "when" our presence in
Iraq will end. This is an important first step on the road home for our
troops. Now, the choice is clear: we can either allow the President to
continue his open-ended war or we can demand accountability by putting an
end to this misguided war. The stakes are enormously high. Thanks for all
you do."
And we got this note to MoveOn members from Congressman John Murtha, who
has been one of the strongest voices against the war:
"Thank you for helping make this bill the strongest it could be--your
voices helped us get a plan that will end the war. All of us want to bring
our brave men and women home from Iraq as soon as possible. While the bill
may not go as far as some of us would prefer, it is a necessary step
toward a safe and responsible end to the war. Bush is threatening to veto
and the Republicans unanimously voted 'NO' in full committee. Let's join
together and take the necessary step forward."
But most important, here is what some of you said about why you voted to
support the plan yesterday:
It will be a huge step forward to pass legislation opposed to the war in
Iraq. Those who want more still need to back this important step. The Bush
administration is counting on the wide spectrum of opinion on the war
among Democrats to prevent passage of such legislation. We need to prove
that Democrats can unite on core principles.--Jeanetta M., Connecticut
We have got to be very careful about dividing and self destructing. Let's
not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.--Sheila C., New Mexico
I voted for the plan, somewhat reluctantly. I'd like to see a resolution
for strengthening diplomatic engagement along with diminishing military
efforts.--Frank B., California
Getting out now would be even better, but we need a large consensus vote
from all opponents, not a symbolic minority vote. Bush is going to veto
the resolution anyway, but we will have marked an important milestone if
this resolution passes. It will be a precedent, and that's highly
important.--Stephen F., Indiana
Reading through thousands of the comments, it was amazing how much most of
us are on the same page. MoveOn members are clear--this is about whether
we set a timeline to withdraw or whether the President succeeds in waging
a war without end. Now we have to make sure the media understands that,
too.
The opinion pages are the most popular pages in the newspaper, and if
thousands of us write, we can help shape public opinion. Even if your
letter isn't published, it shows editors how folks really feel and
influences the way they cover stories. It only takes a few minutes, and
we've included some points to help you put it together at the link below.
Click here to get started on a letter to the editor:
http://pol.moveon.org/lte?campaign_id=72&id=10048-7773210-bwe3ih&t=4
Thanks for all you do.
--Eli, Nita, Tom, Carrie and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team
Tuesday, March 20th, 2007
P.S. Some of you have asked whether we support the Lee Amendment, a
proposal that would accelerate the end of the war. Of course we do--we'd
love for the proposal to bring our troops home sooner, and MoveOn members
are pretty clear on that point. We've been fighting for as strong a bill
as possible. Right now, the Lee Amendment is not being offered, but if it
comes up, we'll definitely encourage Congress to vote for it.</blockquote>
****************
Now we can't say they <i>totally</i> ignored the Lee amendment. I guess we mustn't let the half-full become the enemy of the half-empty, or vice-whatever.
MoveOn has an interesting history. It was founded by a group of business executives to promote moderate politics. It opposed progressive Democrats and conservative Republicans mainly by funding relatively conservative Democratic candidates. In its early years, it helped get several Democrats elected who went on to support going into war.
It now tries to present an image of being progressive and for peace. But its background of hostility to both still comes out. So it is not really surprising that it now advocates massive funding for continued war in Iraq. It is showing its true colors.
Bill Samuel, Silver Spring, MD, USA
http://wsamuel.bravejournal.com/
Anyone see any irony in Mr. Arnot's past employment as a pig farm apologist? Evidently, he's skilled in making the case for embracing that which stinks to high heaven.
Pages