CAN YOU BE SURE THAT ANY PERSON THAT GOT ANY OF THOSE CANCERS ON LIST LIST FROM THE MID 90S TILL NOW DID NOT GET IT FROM BST INJECTED IN THOSE COWS AND CAN YOU ALSO ASURE ME THAT IN 10 OR MORE YRS MY 4 KIDS WILL IN NO WAY GET IT FROM THE BST BEING INJECTED IN THOSE COWS WELL IN ALL REALITY YOU CAN NOT. THERE IS EVIDENCE AND STUDIES OUT THERE SAYING THESE THINGS FOR A REASON SO I AM NOT GOING TO LISTEN TO A REAL PRO NUTRITION COW WHAT EVER WITH WHOM I DONT KNOW WHO THEY WORK FOR OR WHO THEY ARE SAYS ITS OK WHEN THERE IS REASON TO THINK OTHER WISE I AM GOING TO LISTEN TO ALL OF THE RESEARCH I HAVE DONE ON MY OWN AND THINK IF THERE IS EVEN A SMALL CHANCE OF THIS HAPPENING I WONT TAKE THAT CHANCE WITH THE HEALTH OF MY KIDS OR NEIGHBORING KIDS OR SCHOOLS AND NO ONE ELSE SHOULD TAKE THE CHANCE WITH THE LIVES OF THERE KIDS TO SAY OH WELL THIS PERSON SAYS ITS OK SO IT MUST BE THESES STORIES DID NOT JUST COME OUT OF THE WIND THEY HAD TO ORIGINATE FROM SOME WERE THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU THINK AND IF YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO WORRY
Philip Morris established long ago that there is no legal basis for a "right to smoke." In one of their previously privileged documents dated June 24, 1987 entitled "Project Down Under Conference Notes" (about dealing with the secondhand smoke issue), PM states,
"We won't be able to establish 'the right to smoke.' No legal basis for this 'right.' "
See the document for yourself [http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/vvm88d00 here]
Anne Landman
TobaccoWiki Editor
You're certainly welcome to post here and entitled to your opinions, but please refrain from gratuitous insults such as calling someone a "D-Bag." That sort of language doesn't do anything to add understanding and merely makes you look bad in the eyes of anyone who reads it.
To have made that comment, you must indeed be a knower of the basic essence of truth. I have been seeking the basic essence of truth all my life. Not this truth or that truth, but the basic ESSENCE. I thirst for your enlightenment. (Not holding my breath, though.)
Is Army using its officers as the new pundits? See blog debate at
http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/BLOG/blogs/dlro/archive/2009/03/18/information-engagment-or-propaganda-by-another-name.aspx
CAN YOU BE SURE THAT ANY PERSON THAT GOT ANY OF THOSE CANCERS ON LIST LIST FROM THE MID 90S TILL NOW DID NOT GET IT FROM BST INJECTED IN THOSE COWS AND CAN YOU ALSO ASURE ME THAT IN 10 OR MORE YRS MY 4 KIDS WILL IN NO WAY GET IT FROM THE BST BEING INJECTED IN THOSE COWS WELL IN ALL REALITY YOU CAN NOT. THERE IS EVIDENCE AND STUDIES OUT THERE SAYING THESE THINGS FOR A REASON SO I AM NOT GOING TO LISTEN TO A REAL PRO NUTRITION COW WHAT EVER WITH WHOM I DONT KNOW WHO THEY WORK FOR OR WHO THEY ARE SAYS ITS OK WHEN THERE IS REASON TO THINK OTHER WISE I AM GOING TO LISTEN TO ALL OF THE RESEARCH I HAVE DONE ON MY OWN AND THINK IF THERE IS EVEN A SMALL CHANCE OF THIS HAPPENING I WONT TAKE THAT CHANCE WITH THE HEALTH OF MY KIDS OR NEIGHBORING KIDS OR SCHOOLS AND NO ONE ELSE SHOULD TAKE THE CHANCE WITH THE LIVES OF THERE KIDS TO SAY OH WELL THIS PERSON SAYS ITS OK SO IT MUST BE THESES STORIES DID NOT JUST COME OUT OF THE WIND THEY HAD TO ORIGINATE FROM SOME WERE THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU THINK AND IF YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO WORRY
Paige,
You're certainly welcome to post here and entitled to your opinions, but please refrain from gratuitous insults such as calling someone a "D-Bag." That sort of language doesn't do anything to add understanding and merely makes you look bad in the eyes of anyone who reads it.
To have made that comment, you must indeed be a knower of the basic essence of truth. I have been seeking the basic essence of truth all my life. Not this truth or that truth, but the basic ESSENCE. I thirst for your enlightenment. (Not holding my breath, though.)
Is Army using its officers as the new pundits? See blog debate at
http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/BLOG/blogs/dlro/archive/2009/03/18/information-engagment-or-propaganda-by-another-name.aspx
Pages