Anonymous shows a remarkable economy with words and facts of his/her own, which would seem to validate the credibility of the story. I received one of the the "league of voters" e-mails just a few minutes ago. It had a bad smell from the get go.
This is infuriating. How can Seeyle say in good concience that she thought that the merits of the single payer system had been discussed elsewhere in the NYT. I have never seen such an article in any media outlet that could be considered anything approaching mainstream. But I guess she's just giving americans what they want. All the reason to sit back and allow corporate america to run their lives and their government. Wake up america. take back your media, take back your government
What L. Glowacz says is frequently true - journalists prefer good PR people when they are accessible to them.
It's true that the "I am/am not a spokesperson" is intentionally confusing, but the case strikes me as an agency employee doing what they can to help the reporter do his job, while still complying with their client's unwillingness to talk. Many if not most agencies won't comment for the client as a matter of policy, so the employee may also have been going rogue to some extent. Asking that their name not be used would then be a way of protecting him or herself.
mikie mikie.. don't you realize we are at war with a "WORD"!!! you my sheepish friend ,have been hoodwinked,lied to , fed propaganda til you are a shill for the bushies of the gummiement...she's trying to save your sorryass from the powers ,and you want to drink their kool aid.......well sip away.
Anonymous shows a remarkable economy with words and facts of his/her own, which would seem to validate the credibility of the story. I received one of the the "league of voters" e-mails just a few minutes ago. It had a bad smell from the get go.
This is infuriating. How can Seeyle say in good concience that she thought that the merits of the single payer system had been discussed elsewhere in the NYT. I have never seen such an article in any media outlet that could be considered anything approaching mainstream. But I guess she's just giving americans what they want. All the reason to sit back and allow corporate america to run their lives and their government. Wake up america. take back your media, take back your government
What L. Glowacz says is frequently true - journalists prefer good PR people when they are accessible to them.
It's true that the "I am/am not a spokesperson" is intentionally confusing, but the case strikes me as an agency employee doing what they can to help the reporter do his job, while still complying with their client's unwillingness to talk. Many if not most agencies won't comment for the client as a matter of policy, so the employee may also have been going rogue to some extent. Asking that their name not be used would then be a way of protecting him or herself.
Get your facts correct and stop your fear based hate;
Pages