You could also call for an end of free targets for commercial-spewers. After a few months without seeing a commercial, your head feels as clean and fresh as your lungs after you've succeeded at quitting smoking.
Why should people open their heads to ads for Flo-Max and scamming credit repairers when there are so many things to do that improve your brain instead of rotting it?
Wendell:
You are in a unique position and I get the feeling you are treading on egg shells. There is more you can do and I believe you have more insight to share.
At the very least you could find out times and places for "Health Fairs" around the country that lead to your epiphany about health insurance and place this information on your blog for all people that might need this information. That would be a big help to us that do not have health insurance.
Thanks for what you can do.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
I'm a little confused with your suggestion. In your 7:1 ratio, are suggesting to simply flat tax everyone below $350,000 at 10%? That seems hardly fair, although it would free up money both for the middle class and create money flow by people who are just over the $350,000 limit.
It made me wonder the same thing! It did seem like an anachronism and product placement....
The smoking was so out of character and out of time it raises the question of whether someone was paid for her character to smoke.
You could also call for an end of free targets for commercial-spewers. After a few months without seeing a commercial, your head feels as clean and fresh as your lungs after you've succeeded at quitting smoking.
Why should people open their heads to ads for Flo-Max and scamming credit repairers when there are so many things to do that improve your brain instead of rotting it?
Pages