Too Much Fat in Kolata's Coverage? [1]
Submitted by John Stauber [2] on
Felix Gillette criticizes a story [3] by Gina Kolata [4] on a major study examining a low-fat diet for postmenopausal women and finding little positive impact. Gillette says Gina Kolata [4]'s article in the New York Times [5] hyped the study: "[T]he warnings about the potential shortcomings of the study were surrounded by quotes from doctors pumping up the study's 'Holy Geez!' index." Gillette compliments other reporters, saying "perhaps the best article of the bunch was penned by one of the skeptics quoted in Kolata's story," low fat diet proponent Dr. Dean Ornish. On Newsweek's web site [6] Ornish "provided a clear and nuanced take on the study. 'The real lesson of the Women's Health Initiative study is this: if you don't change much, you don't improve much. Small changes in diet don't have much effect on preventing heart disease and cancer in those at high risk. Fat is only part of the story. What we include in our diets is at least as important as what we exclude.' Ditto for good journalism -- what a paper such as the Times [3] chooses to include on its front page is at least as important as what it excludes. On this one, we recommend a little less Kolata [4] in the diet, and a few more caveats."