|
|
NavigationTopicsUser login |
PR Watch, First Quarter 1996, Volume 3, No. 1Flack Attackpublic relationsby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton PR executive Jack Mongoven has a new name for the leftist/environmentalist conspiracy that threatens to destroy civilization as we know it. He calls it the "Precautionary Principle."
Apocalypse Cow: U.S. Denials Deepen Mad Cow Dangermad cow diseaseby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton For seven years the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the multi-billion dollar animal livestock industry have cooperated in a PR cover-up of huge health risks to animals and people in the United States.
USDA's PR Strategyagriculture | mad cow diseaseUSDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) 1991 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Public RelationsThe following extracts are from a government PR strategy document for handling the Mad Cow Disease problem in the United State. The document was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act investigation. With BSE there are two issues where agriculture is vulnerable to media scrutiny. These are the practice of feeding rendered ruminant products to ruminants and the risk to human health. A Decade of Denial: Chronology of the Mad Cow Cover-Upmad cow diseaseby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton 1985Dr. Richard F. Marsh, a TSE expert and researcher at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, investigates a Wisconsin mink herd wiped out by a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) disease picked up from their feed--"downer" dairy cattle. He notifies colleagues of the apparent presence in dairy cows of a TSE agent, publishes peer-reviewed papers and launches a decade of continuing research. 1986Seven cases are reported of a new spongiform encephalopathy called "Mad Cow Disease" in British cattle. 1987England reports 413 new cases of Mad Cow Disease.
Incineration of British cows infected with Mad Cow Disease. 1988Another 2,185 cases of the disease are confirmed. 1989The USDA quietly forms a committee to review the situation in the United
States. Rendering: the "Invisible Industry" Gets a Green Faceliftmad cow diseaseby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton The U.S. Department of Agriculture calls "rendering" a process of heat-treating fat, bone, offal and related material derived from the carcasses of livestock, poultry, fish and used cooking fats and oils. Renderers call themselves "the invisible industry" and are thankful that most people remain blissfully unaware of their existence.
PR Watch Reviews BSE-related Resources on the InternetReporting in PR Watch
Confidence Game: Burson-Marsteller's PR Plan for Silicone Breast Implantshealth | public relationsby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton Once reviled as corporate villains, the manufacturers of silicone breast implants have made a stunning comeback recently in the court of public opinion. A series of scientific studies and news stories have emerged, arguing that breast implants are in fact harmless, and that companies such as Dow Corning and Bristol-Myers are hapless victims of misguided women, greedy attorneys and manipulated juries.
Science Under Pressure: Dow-Funded Studies Say 'No Problem!'health | public relations | scienceby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton Breast implant makers and plastic surgeons have spent vastly more money on PR, attorneys, and lobbying than the women who are suing them for damages. Thanks to PR, the industry has achieved a remarkable reversal, persuading large sectors of the news media that it is the victim of politics, greed and "junk science."
Beauty and the Breast: How Industry Sold Implants to Womenhealth | public relationsby John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton Juries which have issued multi-million-dollar judgments against Dow Corning have based their verdicts on evidence beginning with the first known instances in which silicone was used for breast enlargement.
|
Weekly SpinRecent blog posts
Upcoming events |